Re:CAP Recommends | Is Recycling Broken?

You are here

(U.S. Air Force Photo, by Dave Smith)
June 7, 2017
Re:CAP Staff

Re:CAP Recommends: Is Recycling Broken? by Elizabeth Daigneau for Governing

Who: Daigneau is the Managing Editor of GOVERNING. Daigneau joined GOVERNING in 2004 as an assistant web editor. In addition to her editing duties, she writes about energy and the environment for the magazine. Before joining GOVERNING, she was the assistant to the editor at Foreign Policy magazine. She graduated from American University in 2002 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in journalism and literature. 

What: Large-scale urban recycling operations come with many hindrances: contamination by non-recyclable products, confusion on part of recyclers, and the high cost of processing the materials, to name a few. And there’s no one solution to all of the problems. Take, for example, the problems of low recycling rates and high cost. While single-stream recycling has increased recycling rates and made it easier for us recyclers to throw things in the bin without sorting it, it becomes more expensive to pay employees to sort the materials at the waste facility.

Takeaway: Creative, dynamic solutions are essential to addressing the challenges faced when dealing with recyclable waste. These strategies could take many forms: community education inniatives on recyclable materials; reconstructed contracts that make the city pay facilities for waste intake; banning hard-to-recycle materials (as plastic bags in California have been); or even producer responsibility, where the producers of goods bear some of the economic burden of dealing with waste they create—a tool used in Europe and Canada. It’s imperative that we innovate and collaborate in order to make recycling work in our cities.

Penn LPS

The lifelong learning division of Penn Arts & Sciences

3440 Market Street, Suite 100
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3335

(215) 898-7326
felsinstitute@sas.upenn.edu

Facebook   Twitter   YouTube